Morris v. Deeds

Good Law
972 F.2d 1341·1992 WL 207998·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28040
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 28, 199291-16605California637 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brent Eli MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George DEEDS, Warden; James Rankl, Dag; Scott Bodeau, Dag, Defendants-Appellees, and Paul W. Martin, Assistant Director of Security; Richard Lee, Mgr., Law Librarian; Sgt. Hulbert, John and Jane Does F-M, Defendants. No. 91-16605. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Aug. 28, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brent Eli Morris, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's partial dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 1 In his complaint, Morris challenged the ten-day delay in the shipment of his legal documents when he was transferred from a state prison to a county detention center for court appearances. He also claimed that some of the documents were lost. The district court granted the motions to dismiss filed by two state attorneys general and the state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.