Robert Peernock v. Superior Court, North Valley Judicial District

972 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert PEERNOCK, et al Petitioner-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT, NORTH VALLEY JUDICIAL DISTRICT, et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 90-55399. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 14, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Peernock, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his action against Fred Rimerman, a state judge, for violation of the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization ("RICO") Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1964 . Peernock contends that Judge Rimerman participated in a conspiracy to steal Peernock's assets by appointing a guardian to care for Peernock's minor daughter and a representative to administer the estate of Peernock's deceased wife. Peernock also alleges various procedural irregularities and errors relating to the administration of his estate while he was imprisoned. He…