Ross v. Elliott

Good Law
972 F.2d 1342·1992 WL 167959·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 28043
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 199291-56136California576 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John M. ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Thomas D. ELLIOTT; Joel C. Estes; J. Clifford Wallace, Chief Circuit Judge; Circuit Judge William C. Canby, Jr.; Circuit Judge Charles M. Merrill; Circuit Judge Dorothy W. Nelson; Circuit Judge William A. Norris; Circuit Judge Mary M. Schroeder; Circuit Judge Joseph T. Sneed; Chief Judge Robert E. Coyle; Chief Judge Justin L. Quackenbush; Senior Judge Howard B. Turrentine; Judge John J. Hargrove; Judge Louise D. Malugen; Edward Patrick Swan, Jr.; Howard B. Frank, Esq.; E. Myles Harvey; Malcolm L. Lucas, Chief Judge; Justice Stanley Mosk; Justice Allen E. Broussard, Justice Edward A. Panelli; Justice David N. Eagleson; Justice Marcus M. Kaufman; Justice Joyce L. Kennard; and Honorable Robert Wandruff, the Clerk of the California Supreme Court; William Davis; Diane C. Yu; Herbert Katz; Jennifer Gee; James W. Meyers; Richard J. Zanassi; William B. Enright; Colin P. Wong; Hon.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.