David Rodrigues v. State of Nevada Industrial Insurance System

972 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David RODRIGUES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF NEVADA INDUSTRIAL INSURANCE SYSTEM, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16447. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 6, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Rodrigues appeals pro se the district court's grant of the Nevada State Industrial Insurance System's ("SIIS") motion to quash his complaint for defective service of process. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(d)(6) requires that service of process upon a state or governmental organization be effectuated (1) "by delivering a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the chief executive officer thereof ... or [ (2) ] by serving the summons and complaint in the manner prescribed by the law of that state for the service of the summons or other like process upon…