United States v. Humberto Barroso

972 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto BARROSO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10553. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 5, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Humberto Barroso appeals his sentence imposed after his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 . Barroso contends that the district court erred by adding two points rather than one point to his criminal history score based on a prior state conviction for conspiracy to possess a firearm. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo the district court's application of the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Anderson, 942 F.2d 606, 609 (9th Cir.1991) (en banc). 4 The Guidelines provide that for purposes of the criminal…