Parker

972 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM dated March 16, 1992. Stephen H. MARCUS; Frandzel & Share, a Law Corporation; and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors for Parker North American Corporation, Appellants, v. Michael E. PARKER, Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael E. PARKER, Defendant. 1 No. 92-50198. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 17, 1992. Decided Aug. 26, 1992. 3 Before TANG and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges, and JENSEN, * District Judge. 4 MEMORANDUM ** 5 The appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The district court's denial of the motion to quash the subpoena is an interlocutory order and, as such, is not appealable. Does I through IV (In re Grand Jury Subpoenas Dated Dec. 10, 1987), 926 F.2d 847, 852-53 (9th Cir.1991). Marcus and the law firm must be cited for contempt for failure to comply with the subpoena before…