Donald R. Turner v. U.S. Parole Commission

972 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Donald R. TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee. No. 90-15799. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 14, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donald R. Turner, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition challenging the revocation of his parole by the United States Parole Commission ("Parole Commission"). We review de novo, Tripati v. Henman, 843 F.2d 1160, 1162 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 982 (1988), and we vacate and remand. 3 Turner raised two claims in his section 2241 petition. 4 First, Turner alleged that he had not received a parole revocation hearing. The Parole Commission subsequently held the hearing. Thus, the district court properly dismissed this claim as moot. 5 Second, Turner alleged that…