United States v. David R. Campos

972 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David R. CAMPOS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10458. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 5, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David R. Campos appeals the denial of his motion for additional hearing on the government's petition to revoke his probation. He contends that because he offered newly discovered evidence to impeach a government witness, the district court erred by denying the motion. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 On September 15, 1986, Campos pleaded guilty to firearm possession by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (h)(1) and 924(a). On January 9, 1987, imposition of sentence was suspended, and he was placed on probation for five years. On September 18 and December 6, 1990, the government filed two probation…