United States v. Charles Joseph Delaneuville

972 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Joseph DELANEUVILLE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50600. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 7, 1992. Decided Aug. 20, 1992. Before FLETCHER, O'SCANNLAIN and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 DeLaneuville was convicted after jury trial of conspiracy and of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. He now argues that (a) the district court erred when it denied his motion for a severance from codefendant Lions; (b) there was insufficient evidence to convict him of conspiracy; (c) the district court erred when it admitted the statements of codefendant Lions under the coconspirator exception to the hearsay rule; and (d) the district court erred in instructing the jury not to consider the possible sentence. We affirm. I. Severance 3…