United States v. Juan R. Dominguez

972 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan R. DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50437. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 12, 1992. * Decided Aug. 17, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Juan Dominguez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and possession with intent to distribute cocaine within 1000 feet of an elementary school, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) & 860. Dominguez contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his conspiracy conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 The district court shall order the entry of judgment of acquittal "if the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction." Fed.R.Crim.P. 29(a). Sufficient evidence to support a conviction exists if "a…