United States v. Luis Antonio Diego-Barrera, United States of America v. Adan Barragan-Madujano

972 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Luis Antonio DIEGO-BARRERA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adan BARRAGAN-MADUJANO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-50500, 91-50522. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1992. * Decided July 29, 1992. Before FARRIS, WIGGINS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Luis Antonio Diego-Barrera (Diego) and Adan Barragan-Madujano (Barragan) appeal their sentences after being convicted for possession of heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1)(1). Both defendants executed valid plea agreements. Diego was sentenced to 41 months in custody. He argues that the district court erred by not giving him a two point reduction for acceptance of responsibility. (No. 91-50500). Barragan was sentenced to 51 months. He argues that the district court erred by declining to depart…