United States v. William A. Harvey
Opinion
Opinion
972 F.2d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William A. HARVEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-30319. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 6, 1992 Decided Aug. 11, 1992. Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 William A. Harvey appeals his conviction on a plea of guilty to three counts of distribution of methamphetamine, and his sentence to 188 months. Harvey moved to withdraw his guilty plea before sentencing; after an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied the motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Harvey argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the court was not informed in the Rule 11 hearing of a contingent plea agreement with a co-defendant; there was no factual basis for the plea; it was not voluntary; and he did not understand the…