United States v. Kevin Anthony Hill
Opinion
Opinion
972 F.2d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kevin Anthony HILL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-50582. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 4, 1991. * Decided July 28, 1992. Before SNEED, BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin Anthony Hill conditionally pled guilty to one count of distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Hill claims that he was singled out for selective prosecution on the basis of his race. On appeal, he challenges the district court's denial of his motion for discovery in support of that claim. 3 We do not reach the merits of Hill's claim. We do not have jurisdiction over it unless Hill entered a valid conditional plea. United States v. Carrasco, 786 F.2d 1452, 1453-54 (9th Cir.1986); United States v. Echegoyen, 799 F.2d 1271, 1276 (9th Cir.1986). The validity of Hill's conditional plea is in question because he did…