United States v. Bernard Lincoln Jones

972 F.2d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bernard Lincoln JONES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50786. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 19, 1992. Decided Aug. 27, 1992. Before WILLIAM B. NORRIS, REINHARDT and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Bernard Lincoln Jones entered a guilty plea to a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) (1988), possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. On November 4, 1991, Jones was sentenced to ninety-two months in prison. He appeals his sentence. 3 * Jones first argues the district court failed to comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D), and that such error requires reversal of his sentence. The rule states: 4 If the comments of the defendants and the defendant's counsel or testimony or other information introduced by them allege any factual inaccuracy in the presentence investigation report or the summary of the report…