United States v. Douglas Dean Hannam

972 F.2d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas Dean HANNAM, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50816. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Aug. 27, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Douglas Dean Hannam appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G." or "Guidelines"), following entry of a guilty plea, for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). Hannam contends that the district court erred by adjusting his base offense level upward by two levels for obstruction of justice pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. He argues that the district court failed to make explicit factual findings to support the upward adjustment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. We review the district court's finding that the defendant obstructed justice for clear error. United…