United States v. Gregory Lornell Haney

972 F.2d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory Lornell HANEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10174. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 13, 1992. * Decided July 17, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, POOLE, Circuit Judge, and MARSH, ** District Judge. MEMORANDUM Haney appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for an order granting him credit for time served in a halfway house pursuant to Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533 (9th Cir.1990). The district court held that Brown was irrelevant as it construed 18 U.S.C. § 3568 (repealed). Haney's application was governed by 18 U.S.C. § 3585 , and the district court held that Haney was not entitled to credit under that section. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1291 . We reverse and remand. This term, the Supreme Court held that the…