United States v. Robert Wiley Hickman

Good Law
972 F.2d 1345·1992 WL 185483·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27606
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 5, 199290-30101California341 words

Opinion

Opinion

972 F.2d 1345 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Wiley HICKMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 90-30101. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 5, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Wiley Hickman appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines, following his plea of guilty, for one count of armed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a). The district court sentenced Hickman to 75 months imprisonment and five years supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Counsel's request to withdraw as counsel from an appeal based on an absence of appealable issues must be accompanied by a brief referring to any point that might arguably support the appeal. Anders v. California, 386 F.2d 738, 744 (1967). A court of appeals must make its own examination of the record to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.