United States v. Larry Jay Pritz

972 F.2d 1346 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Jay PRITZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-35961. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 7, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Larry Jay Pritz appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. He was convicted by jury trial of manufacturing and possessing methamphetamine and sentenced to 21 years imprisonment. He contends that the district court erred by denying without an evidentiary hearing his claim that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his attorney did not call certain witnesses at a suppression hearing and at trial. He also contends that he was denied due process because the government did not disclose a witness's grand jury testimony until the day before trial. We have…