United States v. Curtis Fitzgerald White

972 F.2d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Curtis Fitzgerald WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 27, 1992. * Decided July 31, 1992. Before WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Curtis Fitzgerald White appeals his jury conviction for unlawful sale and delivery of firearms, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 and 924. White's counsel filed an Anders brief, see Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), which identified three possible issues for review: (1) White's motion in limine to exclude tape recordings made by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms; (2) eight hearsay, relevance, and inadequate foundation objections to evidence offered at trial; and (3) White's Fed.R.Crim.P. 29 motion for judgment of acquittal. We grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm. 3 Evidentiary rulings are reviewed for an…