United States v. Louis Thiederman, United States of America v. James Curtis Maki, United States of America v. Bonnie Maki

972 F.2d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis THIEDERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Curtis MAKI, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bonnie MAKI, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30308, 91-30324 and 91-30327. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 9, 1992. Decided July 24, 1992. Before ALARCON, RYMER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 James Maki, Bonnie Maki, and Louis Thiederman appeal their convictions on various methamphetamine charges, and Bonnie Maki appeals her sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Bonnie and James Maki argue that the search of their residence violated the Fourth Amendment because the search warrant affidavit did not provide a substantial basis for finding probable cause. They argue in addition that items found…