United States v. Charles Richard Williams

972 F.2d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Richard WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 18, 1992. * Decided Aug. 28, 1992. 1 Before TANG and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges, and WALKER, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellant Charles Richard Williams pleaded guilty to a one count indictment charging him with conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to one hundred and twenty-one months imprisonment pursuant to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines. Williams appeals the district court's refusal to sentence him to the amount of time he would have received had he been prosecuted and sentenced in California state court, on the ground that sentencing him according to the Sentencing Guidelines violated his right to due process.…