United States v. Hugh James Yellowshirt

972 F.2d 1347 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh James YELLOWSHIRT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-10383. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 5, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Hugh James Yellowshirt appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for aggravated sexual abuse of a child under the age of twelve in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153 and 2241(c). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Yellowshirt's counsel filed a brief which identified two possible issues for review: (1) whether the district court erred by allegedly failing to determine if the plea was knowing and voluntary; and (2) whether Yellowshirt was denied effective assistance of counsel during his plea hearing. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we grant counsel's request to withdraw and affirm the…