Randal N. Wiideman v. Kathleen G. Leander

972 F.2d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Randal N. WIIDEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kathleen G. LEANDER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16357. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Aug. 28, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Randal N. Wiideman, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of a prison mailroom official on the ground of qualified immunity in Wiideman's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We review de novo, Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990), and we affirm. 3 Wiideman contends that the mailroom official violated his first amendment rights by failing to send him a package containing religious material. This contention lacks merit. 4 Prison actions or regulations that infringe upon an inmate's free exercise of his religious beliefs are valid…