Ennis E. White v. City of San Diego

972 F.2d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ennis E. WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et. al., Respondent-Appellees. No. 91-55912. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 27, 1992. * Decided Aug. 4, 1992. Before WRIGHT, FARRIS, and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ennis E. White appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint prior to service and without prejudice. In his complaint, White alleged that the San Diego Police Department provided false information that was submitted at White's arraignment. The court held that the police officers were absolutely immune. We affirm. 3 In Demoran v. Witt, 781 F.2d 155 (9th Cir.1986), Demoran alleged that Witt, a California probation officer, filed an erroneous presentence report. We noted that "[c]ourts have extended absolute judicial immunity ... to officers whose functions bear a close association to the judicial process," id.…