Dwight D. Wimbley v. Robert G. Borg Wanda A. Briscoe Richard Campbell J. Graham James Rowland

972 F.2d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Dwight D. WIMBLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert G. BORG; Wanda A. Briscoe; Richard Campbell; J. Graham; James Rowland, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15871. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 20, 1992. * Decided July 23, 1992. Before CANBY, REINHARDT and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dwight Wimbley appeals pro se from the district court's summary judgment dismissal of his civil rights action against various prison officials, arguing that the institution's failure to provide him with vocational or college courses constitutes cruel and unusual punishment and a denial of his due process and equal protection rights. We reject these contentions and affirm. 3 Prisoners have no constitutional right to rehabilitation, see Coakley v. Murphy, 884 F.2d 1218, 1221 (9th Cir.1989), including educational opportunities and vocational training. See, e.g., Rizzo v. Dawson, 778 F.2d 527, 531…