William Lee Walker v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department

972 F.2d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William Lee WALKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16455. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 29, 1992. * Decided Aug. 12, 1992. Before TANG, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William Lee Walker, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's order transferring his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action from the Eastern District of California to the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (a). We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 Walker filed this action in the Eastern District of California, where he is currently incarcerated. He alleges civil rights violations during pre-trial detention by the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. All defendants reside in the Central District of California, and the claim arose in the Central District. The district…