Edward F. Wills, Kenneth Lee Krause, and David Bean v. Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc.

972 F.2d 1348 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edward F. WILLS, Kenneth Lee Krause, and David Bean, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. COMMERCIAL DRAPERY CONTRACTORS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16806. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 27, 1992. * Decided Aug. 4, 1992. Before WRIGHT, FARRIS and BEEZER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Edward Wills, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals the district court's dismissal of his 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) claim against Commercial Drapery Contractors, Inc. for allegedly withholding required prison workers' wages. The district court dismissed Wills' complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d). We affirm. 3 Section 1915(d) permits the district court to dismiss an in forma pauperis claim "if satisfied that the action is frivolous or malicious." Dismissal before service of process on § 1915(d) grounds is proper. Neitzke v. Williams,…