United States v. Ognian Bozarov

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 11123·974 F.2d 1037·1992 WL 187634·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 18034·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6934
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 199291-50646California5,383 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nelson, J.

OVERVIEW

The United States appeals the dismissal of its indictment charging Ognian Bozarov with conspiracy to violate the Export Administration Act of 1979 (EAA or Act), 50 U.S.C.App. § 2401 et seq., for his role in a scheme to transport computer disc manufacturing equipment to Bulgaria. The district court dismissed the indictment based on its determination that the EAA was unconstitutional under the nondelegation doctrine because it delegated to the Secretary of Commerce legislative authority to control exports and prohibited judicial review of the Secretary’s decisions. We reverse the decision of the district court because we believe that the Act’s preclusion of judicial review does not violate the non-delegation doctrine. Because we interpret the Act to permit courts to review colorable constitutional challenges to the Act and claims that the Secretary has acted completely outside the scope of his delegated powers, we conclude that the EAA satisfies constitutional requirements.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Export Administration Act

The EAA authorizes the executive branch to impose export controls for reasons of national security, foreign policy, or domestic short…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.