Aetna Casualty And Surety Company v. Ned Merritt

Good Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 12555·974 F.2d 1196·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 20924·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7713
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 199291-55344California1,966 words

Opinion

Opinion

974 F.2d 1196 AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ned MERRITT; Julius T. Toth, Jr.; Foothill Service Corporation; Nordhoff et al., Defendants-Appellants, RFS Development Corporation, et al., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Crossclaimant-Appellant. No. 91-55344. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 8, 1992. Decided Sept. 9, 1992. Robert D. Phillips, Jr., Bowles & Verna, Walnut Creek, Cal., for defendant-appellant RFS Corp. Jeanette Torrel Maginnis, Maginnis & Maginnis, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants Ned Merritt, Julius T. Toth, Jr., Lisa Toth and Ida Toth. Keith A. Turner, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. NOONAN, Circuit Judge: 1 Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, a Connecticut corporation, (Aetna) brought suit for declaratory judgment against Ned Merritt and Julius T. Toth, Jr., citizens of California, Foothill Service Corporation (Foothill), and RFS Development Corporation (RFS), California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.