United States v. A. Lanoy Alston, D.M.D., P.C. Ronald D. Walker Desert Valley Dental, Ltd. Richard B. Meyer Aaron L. ("Lanoy") Alston

Bad Law
92 Daily Journal DAR 12622·974 F.2d 1206·1992 WL 217065·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 21103·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7764
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 199291-10040California4,568 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

We examine three dentists’ criminal antitrust convictions.

Background

Aaron Lanoy Alston, Richard B. Meyer and Ronald D. Walker provide dental services for members of prepaid dental plans in Tucson, Arizona. They and other providers receive two kinds of payments: capitation fees, which are paid by the plans to the dentists based on the number of plan-member patients they see, and co-payment fees, which are paid by the patients to the dentists based on the services performed. The plans, not the dentists, determine both fee amounts.

Co-payment fees in Tucson had not risen for ten years, although they had in other cities, including nearby Phoenix. Some Tucson dentists were failing to break even on the most commonly performed services, such as porcelain crowning. Several Tucson dentists had individually approached the plans about increasing the fee schedule; their efforts proved unsuccessful. Drs. Alston, Meyer and Walker were among the dentists who felt the fees were too low. They met with about fifty local dentists at Dr. Alston’s office to discuss the fees, after which many of those present at the meeting mailed letters to the plans requesting higher fees. The plans did in fact…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.