Ruben W. Espinoza v. Wayne Seifert

974 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ruben W. ESPINOZA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Wayne SEIFERT, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-55593. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 21, 1992. * Decided Sept. 10, 1992. Before TANG and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges, and SHUBB ** , District Judge. MEMORANDUM *** Appellant Ruben W. Espinoza, who is serving a ten year sentence on five counts of bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (a), appeals the district court's second denial of his application for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as well as its denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 , from the section 2255 adjudication. The district court had jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2255 and this court also has jurisdiction under these statutes and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. * Espinoza's current counsel, E. Thomas Chavez, filed an Anders brief on his client's…