Daniel R. De Nardo v. Karl Johnstone Patrick Murphy Alaska Public Employees Association

974 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel R. De NARDO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Karl JOHNSTONE; Patrick Murphy; Alaska Public Employees Association, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-35631. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 21, 1992. * Decided Aug. 31, 1992. Before HUG, D.W. NELSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel De Nardo appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Alaska Public Employees Association ("APEA") and Patrick Murphy, an APEA agent, and also appeals the dismissal of De Nardo's action against Alaska judge Karl Johnstone. We affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court applied the correct substantive law. Tzung v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 873 F.2d 1338, 1339-40 (9th Cir.1989).…