Almario M. Aviles v. Meris Laboratories

974 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Almario M. AVILES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MERIS LABORATORIES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-15857. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 16, 1992. * Decided Sept. 11, 1992. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** OVERVIEW 2 Almario Aviles assigns error to the district court's grant of summary judgment to Meris Laboratories, its officers and employees (collectively "Meris"), on his claims of national origin and age discrimination under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 623 ("ADEA"). We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c), and we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 Aviles applied for different technical positions with Meris. After he was not offered employment, he commenced four suits against Meris. In June and July of 1989, Aviles filed suit in the Santa…