In Re Emanuel M. Comora, Debtor. Emanuel M. Comora v. David Radell Irvin Radell Nancy Radell Mary Radell

974 F.2d 1341 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Emanuel M. COMORA, Debtor. Emanuel M. COMORA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David RADELL; Irvin Radell; Nancy Radell; Mary Radell, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55731. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 30, 1992. * Decided Sept. 3, 1992. Before KILKENNY, GOODWIN and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Emanuel Comora appeals pro se from the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's dismissal with prejudice of Comora's adversary proceeding challenging the Radells' sale of two parcels of realty and their application of the sale proceeds to a judgment previously obtained by the Radells against Comora and others. Although Comora asserts at least six grounds of error in his appeal, 1 the sole issue before us is whether Comora's action is barred by prior decisions of this court and/or other tribunals. 3 As evidenced both by the record in this case and from our…