Greater Anchorage, Inc. v. Vernon Nowell, Greater Anchorage, Inc., an Alaska Corporation v. Vernon Nowell

974 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. GREATER ANCHORAGE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernon NOWELL, Defendant-Appellant. GREATER ANCHORAGE, INC., an Alaska corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Vernon NOWELL, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 91-35232, 91-35473. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 18, 1992. Decided Sept. 14, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska; No. CV-89-0047-JKS, James K. Singleton, District Judge, Presiding. D.Alaska AFFIRMED. Before HUG, D.W. NELSON and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This is a service mark infringement case. Appellant Greater Anchorage, Inc. argues that appellee Vernon Nowell infringes Greater Anchorage's service mark by using the words "Fur Rendezvous" on the lapel pins he sells even though the pins have disclaimers on them. The district court ruled that Nowell may continue to sell his pins as long as he sells them with the…