Robert F. Koehler, Jr. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

974 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert F. KOEHLER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EASTMAN KODAK CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-16471. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 19, 1992. Decided Sept. 10, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-87-0486-MLS; Milton L. Schwartz, District Judge, Presiding. 2 E.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before KOZINSKI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and VON DER HEYDT, District Judge. * 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 Robert F. Koehler, Jr. appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his complaint against Eastman Kodak Co. under Rule 12(b)(6). Koehler was granted leave to amend. He elected not to amend, however, because he contends the district court threatened him with Rule 11 sanctions if his amended complaint did not state a claim. 7 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm the dismissal of Koehler's complaint,…