Harold Hammond, Plaintiffs/counter-Defendants/appellees v. County of Madera, Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellant, and United States of America, Harold Hammond, Plaintiffs/counter-Defendants/appellants v. County of Madera, Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellee, and United States of America, Counter-Defendant/appellee

974 F.2d 1342 23 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,117 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harold HAMMOND, et al., Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants/Appellees, v. COUNTY OF MADERA, et al., Defendant/Counter-claimant/Appellant, and United States of America, Defendant/Appellee. Harold HAMMOND, et al., Plaintiffs/Counter-defendants/Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MADERA, et al., Defendant/Counter-claimant/Appellee, and United States of America, Counter-defendant/Appellee. Nos. 90-16408, 90-16496 and 91-15085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 13, 1992. Decided Sept. 2, 1992. 1 Before SCHROEDER and FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and WATERS * , Senior District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The County of Madera ("County") appeals from the Judgment in Condemnation Proceeding, filed September 13, 1990, instructing the County to pay Counter-defendants ("the Hammonds") $113,747.00 as just compensation for the Hammonds' property and for the road and bridge improvements…