Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Defendant-Counter-Claimant/appellee, Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellee v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Defendant-Counter-Claimant/appellant

974 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. MERCEDES-BENZ OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-counter-defendant/Appellant, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., Defendant-counter-claimant/Appellee, MERCEDES-BENZ OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff-counter-defendant/Appellee, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY CO., Defendant-counter-claimant/Appellant. Nos. 89-56011, 89-56012. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 7, 1991. Decided Aug. 24, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Nos. CV-86-2371-AWT; CV-86-2371-AWT; A. Wallace Tashima, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED. MEMORANDUM * Before GOODWIN, PREGERSON and ALARCON, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The memorandum filed June 2, 1992 is ordered WITHDRAWN. 2 Mercedes Benz of North America ("Mercedes") and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company ("Hartford") both appeal the…