Peter Kuyper and Edmund Boragno v. James Parks, Individually, and Parks, Palmer, Turner and Yemenidjian

974 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Peter KUYPER and Edmund Boragno, et. al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James PARKS, individually, and Parks, Palmer, Turner and Yemenidjian, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55572. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1992. * Decided Sept. 4, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-90-5169 WJR; William J. Rea, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before SNEED and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WANGER ** District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 In this securities fraud action, two plaintiffs, Peter Kuyper and Edmund Boragno, appeal from the District Court's dismissal with prejudice of their second amended complaint for failure to plead fraud with specificity and failure to state claims. Five counts remain at issue: violations of RICO, common law fraud, professional negligence, violations of § 771(2) (12-2) of the…