Joseph Cortez Guce Jocelyn Robles Guce v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service

974 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph Cortez GUCE; Jocelyn Robles Guce, Petitioners, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70393. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 18, 1992. * Decided Sept. 9, 1992. Petition to Review a decision of the Immigration and Naturalization Service; No. Alq-xgb-hxw. I.N.S. PETITION DENIED. Before WIGGINS, O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph Cortez Guce and Jocelyn Robles Guce petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision denying their motion to reopen deportation proceedings. The Guces contend that the BIA abused its discretion when it found that they had not established a prima facie case of statutory eligibility for suspension of deportation. We deny the petition and affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Joseph and Jocelyn Guce, citizens of the Philippines, entered the United States in July of 1982 on a nonimmigrant visa.…