William C. Falk v. United States

974 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. William C. FALK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15031. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Sept. 1, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 William C. Falk appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States. Falk's action was based on the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671-2680 ("FTCA"). The district court dismissed the action finding it barred by the FTCA's two-year statute of limitations. 28 U.S.C. § 2401 (b). We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Kruso v. International Tel. & Tel. Corp., 872 F.2d 1416 , 1421 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 496 U.S. 937 (1990). We affirm. 3 Falk's allegations of tortious governmental conduct under the FTCA involve actions by a governmental agency which are…