Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Lyons Plastering, Inc.

Good Law
974 F.2d 1342·1992 WL 219073·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30661
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 199291-16034California1,986 words

Opinion

Opinion

974 F.2d 1342 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LYONS PLASTERING, INC,; Charles Marion Heers; Betty R. Daddato; Charles Michael Heers, Jr.; Jesse Heers, and as Assignees for Larry and Jacqueline Lyons, individually as husband and wife, Defendant-Appellants. No. 91-16034. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 21, 1992. * Decided Sept. 11, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-89-00178-PGR, Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. AFFIRMED. Before WIGGINS, O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paula Heers and other members of the Heers family (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Heers") appeal the district court's summary judgment in favor of Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. and against its insureds, Larry and Jacqueline Lyons (the Lyonses), Lyons Plastering, Inc., and Lyons…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.