Samuel Rudnick and Pearl Rudnick, Creditors-Appellees v. Ben W. Allustiarte, and Linda M. Allustiarte, Debtors-Appellants. In Re Ben W. Allustiarte and Linda M. Allustiarte, Debtors. Samuel Rudnick and Pearl Rudnick, Creditors-Appellants v. Ben W. Allustiarte, and Linda M. Allustiarte, Debtors-Appellees

Good Law
974 F.2d 1343·1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 30669
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 31, 199288-15368California1,584 words

Opinion

Opinion

974 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel RUDNICK and Pearl Rudnick, Creditors-Appellees, v. Ben W. ALLUSTIARTE, and Linda M. Allustiarte, Debtors-Appellants. In re Ben W. ALLUSTIARTE and Linda M. Allustiarte, Debtors. Samuel RUDNICK and Pearl Rudnick, Creditors-Appellants, v. Ben W. ALLUSTIARTE, and Linda M. Allustiarte, Debtors-Appellees. Nos. 88-15368, 88-15369. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 14, 1992. Decided Aug. 31, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, No. CV-81-0010-RAR; Raul A. Ramirez, District Judge, Presiding. 2 E.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before FLETCHER and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WILSON, * District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 Ben and Linda Allustiarte, debtors in a Chapter XII bankruptcy action, appeal the district court's adoption of a Special Master's Report. The report was an accounting of the rights of the Allustiartes and Samuel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.