David C. Rosevell v. George Deeds, Warden

974 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David C. ROSEVELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George DEEDS, Warden, et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-16352. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Sept. 1, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Former Nevada state prisoner David Rosevell appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Rosevell contends that the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his medical needs in violation of the eighth amendment of the United States Constitution. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo. Barlow v. Ground, 943 F.2d 1132, 1134 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied 112 S.Ct. 2995 (1992). Summary judgment is appropriate if the evidence, construed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,…