Ras Adisa Gamba Oluwa v. Doc Smith

974 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ras Adisa Gamba OLUWA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doc SMITH, et al. Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16006. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Sept. 1, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ras Adisa Gamba Oluwa, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment following a jury verdict in favor of the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Oluwa contends that it was a miscarriage of justice for the jury to determine that the defendants did not subject Oluwa to cruel and unusual punishment and excessive force in violation of his eighth amendment rights. Because Oluwa has not provided a transcript for appellate review, we dismiss his appeal. 3 "If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or is contrary to the evidence, the appellant shall…