Telecredit Service Corp. v. Electronic Transaction Corp. Electronic Transaction Corp. D/B/A "Scan" David Alexander Denis Dunann

974 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. TELECREDIT SERVICE CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CORP.; Electronic Transaction Corp. d/b/a "Scan"; David Alexander; Denis Dunann, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55686. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 7, 1992. Decided Sept. 4, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court For the Central District of California, No. CV-90-2620-IH; Irving Hill, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before SNEED and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and WANGER, District Judge. * OVERVIEW 5 Appellant Telecredit Services Corp. ("Telecredit") brought this unfair competition claim under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (a), against competitor Electronic Transaction Corp. ("ETC"). Telecredit alleged that ETC had violated the Lanham Act by circulating a flyer falsely claiming that ETC's prices were lower than Telecredit's. The district…