Brendan Trainor v. United States

974 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brendan TRAINOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-16486. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 19, 1992. * Decided Sept. 9, 1992. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; No. CV-89-00531-HDM, Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding. AFFIRMED. Before WIGGINS, O'SCANNLAIN and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Brendan Trainor appeals the district court's dismissal of his pro se complaint against the United States. Trainor alleges that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) levied upon his property in violation of his rights under the Fourth, Fifth, and Seventh Amendments. The district court found it lacked subject matter jurisdiction and it dismissed Trainor's complaint. We affirm. 3 Trainor does not rely upon any statute which grants the district court subject matter jurisdiction over his suit. 1 The…