United States v. Arthur Packard Condie, United States of America v. Arthur Packard Condie

974 F.2d 1343 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Packard CONDIE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Packard CONDIE, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-10168, 91-10483. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 17, 1992. * Decided Sept. 14, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; No. CR-89-00162-LDG, Lloyd D. George, District Judge, Presiding. 2 D.Nev. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 Before KOZINSKI and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and KELLEHER, District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM *** 6 Arthur Packard Condie was convicted of securities fraud, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b) and 78ff(a); illegally structuring currency transactions, 31 U.S.C. § 5324 ; conspiring to defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371 ; and traveling in interstate commerce to aid a racketeering enterprise, 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (a)(3). He appeals on a…