United States v. Jose Saul Zapien-Miranda

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Saul ZAPIEN-MIRANDA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30008. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 24, 1992. * Decided Sept. 1, 1992. Before BRUNETTI, RYMER and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Zapien-Miranda appeals from his sentence, imposed following entry of a guilty plea, for illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . Zapien-Miranda contends that the district court erred by failing to give sufficient notice of its intention to disregard the joint sentencing recommendation to sentence him to the lower end of the applicable range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We lack jurisdiction to review Zapien-Miranda's sentence and dismiss the appeal. 3 A sentence imposed within the applicable Guidelines range is not appealable absent a showing that it was imposed in violation of law. United States v.…