United States v. Joseph Bernard Widby

974 F.2d 1344 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Joseph Bernard WIDBY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 20, 1992. Decided Sept. 3, 1992. 1 Appeal from the United District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-89-0970-JMI-1; James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding. 2 C.D.Cal. 3 AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. 4 Before TANG, and CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judges, and SHUBB, * District Judge. 5 MEMORANDUM ** 6 Joseph Widby, an African American, was arrested during Operation Streetsweep, a nationwide law enforcement crackdown targeting gang members. Widby appeals his conviction and sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g). 7 Widby also appeals the district court's enhancement of his sentence, pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.1. The…